Track C - Culture Requirement
Assessment Plan
Track C is one of three options included in the non-sequential MPSL Language/Cultures component.
Learning Goals
The learning outcome goals for students taking culture studies (track C) are that students will take three related courses in history, social institutions, and cultures (9 credits) preferably focusing on a single area of the world to:
- develop depth of learning in a related area of cultures and societal studies, and
- demonstrate advanced levels of development in the chosen area.
Learning Story
Most Track C students (in consultation with their advisors) choose courses, which fall under the general umbrella of cultural studies, and have at least an implicit thematic linkage to some aspect of cultures and societies other than their own. Intentionality and insight are crucial on the part of the advisor and the student as they piece together the track.
Informal, Indirect Assessment
Due to the diversity of course offerings, disciplinary choices, and sequencing options, assessment occurs only in informal and indirect ways. Faculty consensus is that, in terms of the stated learning goals of the track, the actual delivery of the track falls short. While in most cases the track achieves the broad goals of enhancing students’ awareness of cultures and societies other their own, providing global perspective, and adding meaning and value to their personal lives, it does not always provide “depth of learning” and “advanced levels of development” in a particular culture. Also, the stated requirement favors a focus on one particular area of the world, and the limitations imposed by scheduling and course offerings often preclude narrow focus.
Right now, the best-case scenario is a track that provides a breadth of exposure in different potential forms. The worst-case scenario is a track that is pieced together randomly and without regard for thematic linkage or real exploration of different cultures/societies. Anecdotal evidence suggests that both scenarios exist, with no mechanism in place to prevent the latter.
Improvement Recommendations
Track C has been the subject of extensive discussion and debate among the faculty for at least the last two years. Weaknesses of the track have been discussed and numerous suggestions for improvement have been made through many channels, but the faculty have not come to a decision regarding the future of the track and how it functions. This report suggests some interim adjustments that could improve the function of the track, at least in the short term. |
